Entrepreneurship as a dynamic field of study: A bibliometric analysis of research output


  • Luis Javier Cabeza-Ramírez
  • Sandra M Sanchez-Cañizares
  • Fernando J Fuentes-García


Literature review, H-index, entrepreneurship


The present study’s objective was to carry out a systematic literature review whose main value lies in updating and analysing the current state of scientific production in the field of entrepreneurship based on the best known international bibliographic databases, Web of Science and Scopus. To this end, the relevant papers published in indexed international journals were selected from both databases. The most-cited research was identified by setting a standardised threshold number of citations based on the H-index called ‘H-Classics’, which is sensitive to the particular characteristics of each research area. This study analysed the most important authors, years of greater production, journals, cited authors, themes, subject areas, text typology, countries, institutional affiliations and keywords. The results are rankings of journals and authors based on the weights given by both databases’ H-index for citation frequency.


Amit, R., Glosten, L., & Muller, E. (1993). Challenges to theory development in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Management studies, 30(5), 815-834.

Audretsch, D. B., Kuratko, D. F., & Link, A. N. (2015). Making sense of the elusive paradigm of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 45(4), 703-712.

Baumol, W. J. (1996). Entrepreneurship: productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(1), 3-22.

Beltrán Galvis, O. A. (2005). Revisiones sistemáticas de la literatura. Rev. colomb. gastroenterol, 20(1), 60-69.

Bornmann, L., & Marx, W. (2011). The h index as a research performance indicator. Eur Sci Ed, 37(3), 77-80.

Boulard, M. M. (2011). La dirección de empresas ante los retos del siglo XXI: homenaje al profesor Juan José Renau Piqueras. Valencia: Universitat de València.

Bygrave, W. D., & Hofer, C. W. (1991). Theorizing about entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship theory and Practice, 16(2), 13-22.

Cuervo, A., Ribeiro, D., & Roig, S. (2006). Entrepreneurship: conceptos, teoría y perspectiva. Introducción. Entrepreneurship: Conceptos, teoría y perspectiva, 9-25.

Denyer, D., & Neely, A. (2004). Introduction to special issue: innovation and productivity performance in the UK. International Journal of Management Reviews, 5(3?4), 131-135.

Díaz, C. (2002). La creación de empresas: revisión histórica de teorías y escuelas. Trujillo: Ediciones La Coria. Fundación Xavier de Salas.

Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google scholar: strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB journal, 22(2), 338-342.

Frank, H., & Landström, H. (2015). What makes entrepreneurship research interesting? Reflections on strategies to overcome the rigour–relevance gap. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 1-25.

Garfield, E. (1977). Introducing citation classics: the human side of scientific reports. Current Contents, 1, 5-7.

Gartner, W. B. (1985). A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy of management review, 10(4), 696-706.

Genescà, E., & Aponte, M. (2003). Creación de empresas (Vol. 33). Barcelona: Univ. Autònoma de Barcelona.

Gomez-Jauregui, V., Gomez-Jauregui, C., Manchado, C., & Otero, C. (2014). Information management and improvement of citation indices. International Journal of Information Management, 34(2), 257-271.

Jones, M. V., Coviello, N., & Tang, Y. K. (2011). International entrepreneurship research (1989–2009): a domain ontology and thematic analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(6), 632-659.

Karatas-Ozkan, M., & Chell, E. (2013). Handbook of research in small business and entrepreneurship. Cheltemham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Khalid, K. S., & Kunz, R. (2003). Systematic reviews to support evidence-based medicine. Berlin: Springer.

Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK: Keele University.

Landström, H., Harirchi, G., & Åström, F. (2012). Entrepreneurship: exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy, 41(7), 1154-1181.

Libmann, F. (2007). Web of Science, Scopus, and classical online: philosophies of searching. Online, 31(3), 36-40.

Liñán, F., & Fayolle, A. (2015). A systematic literature review on entrepreneurial intentions: citation, thematic analyses, and research agenda. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(4), 907-933.

Low, M. B. (2001). The adolescence of entrepreneurship research: specification of purpose. Entrepreneurship: Theory and practice, 25(4), 17-26.

Low, M. B., & MacMillan, I. C. (1988). Entrepreneurship: past research and future challenges. Journal of management, 14(2), 139-161.

Manchado del Val, C. (2015). Análisis de criterios de visibilidad e Impacto Visual: metodología de uso en proyectos de infraestructuras. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Cantabria.

Marin-Garcia, J. A. (2008). Guía de investigación para el desarrollo de la carrera del profesorado: organización de empresas. Valencia: Editorial de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia.

Martínez Sánchez, M. Á. (2014). Aplicación de técnicas bibliométricas en el análisis del área de trabajo social. Granada: Universidad de Granada.

Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar.Journal of the american society for information science and technology, 58(13), 2105-2125.

Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770-791.

Minniti, M. (2013). The Dynamics of Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Data. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Moroz, P. W., & Hindle, K. (2012). Entrepreneurship as a process: Toward harmonizing multiple perspectives. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,36(4), 781-818.

Norris, M., & Oppenheim, C. (2007). Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature. Journal of Informetrics,1(2), 161-169.

Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

Pittaway, L., Holt, R., & Broad, J. (2014). 6. Synthesising knowledge in entrepreneurship research–the role of systematic literature. Handbook of Research on Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D., & Neely, A. (2004). Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 5(3?4), 137-168.

Sassmannshausen, S. P. (2012). 99 entrepreneurship journals: A comparative empirical investigation of rankings, impact, and H/HC-index (No. 2012-002). Schumpeter Discussion Papers.

Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2014). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.

Schreiber, M. (2010). Twenty Hirsch index variants and other indicators giving more or less preference to highly cited papers. Annalen der Physik, 522(8), 536-554.

Shane, S. A. (1997). Who is publishing the entrepreneurship research?. Journal of Management, 23(1), 83-95.

Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of management review, 25(1), 217-226.

Stevenson, H. H., & Jarillo, J. C. (2007). A Paradigm of Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial Management. Berlin: Springer.

Stewart, A., & Cotton, J. (2013). Making sense of entrepreneurship journals: Journal rankings and policy choices. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 19(3), 303-323.

Teixeira, A. A., & Ferreira, E. (2013). Intellectual structure of the entrepreneurship field: a tale based on three core journals. Journal of Innovation Management, 1(2), 21-66.

Thorpe, R., Holt, R., Macpherson, A., & Pittaway, L. (2005). Using knowledge within small and medium?sized firms: a systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(4), 257-281.

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence?informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British journal of management, 14(3), 207-222.

Veciana, J. M. (2007). Entrepreneurship as a Scientific Research Programme. Berlin: Springer.

Vesper, K. H. (1983). Entrepreneurship and national policy (Vol. 3). Chicago: Walter E. Heller International Corporation Institute for Small Business.

Vieira, E., & Gomes, J. (2009). A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science for a typical university. Scientometrics, 81(2), 587-600.

Wang, X., & Jessup, L. M. (2014). A review and synthesis of entrepreneurship research: towards an integrative model of dependent variables. Journal of Entrepreneurship, 23(2), 163-199.






Business/Management: Research Papers

How to Cite

Cabeza-Ramírez, L. J., Sanchez-Cañizares, S. M., & Fuentes-García, F. J. (2024). Entrepreneurship as a dynamic field of study: A bibliometric analysis of research output. Tourism & Management Studies, 13(3), 59-71. https://www.tmstudies.net/index.php/ectms/article/view/975

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>